111 510 510 libonline@riphah.edu.pk Contact

Security meltdown

Shocking as it may be, despite the uncontrollable spiral of militant violence threatening to push the country beyond the brink, we do not have a coherent strategy to counter the grave challenges to our security. The new government now seems to have woken up to the need for devising a new national security policy. But does it have the strategic vision and resolve to formulate an overarching and viable strategy to secure Pakistan against a dangerous mix of internal and external threats?

For long, the national security policy remained the sole domain of the military establishment. The policy, based on a narrow prism of traditional external threat perceptions alone, is no more relevant to the fast-changing domestic security landscape. This approach failed to factor in the various dimensions of the security paradigm. A purely militaristic approach has proved disastrous for internal security.

Many security problems presently confronting the country emanate from that flawed strategic outlook. There hasn’t been any effort to evolve a comprehensive strategy integrating defence, foreign and economic policies.

All of them are important components of national security. Terrorism and militancy have largely been dealt with, in a limited way, as law and order problems.

With the country now confronting multiple challenges of terrorism, violent extremism and low-intensity insurgencies, it has become much more urgent to evolve a holistic, overarching national security strategy.

A review has become necessary as more than external factors the country’s security is now threatened by the prospect of an economic collapse and security meltdown.

Chronic instability has retarded economic growth. In the climate of perpetual domestic turmoil, the writ of the state is fast shrinking.

The government’s control is tenuous over large swathes of the land. Karachi, Pakistan’s largest city and economic jugular, has virtually turned into a lawless territory as armed gangs under the patronage of different political parties fight for influence.

Meanwhile, the country has earned the dubious distinction of being the largest incubator of jihadi extremism threatening not only its own security, but also the region’s stability. It has long been the centre of a proxy war between Arab countries and Iran, fuelling sectarian violence.

The state seems to have no control over the massive flow of funds from Middle Eastern countries to radical madressahs in Balochistan.

According to intelligence sources, radical Islamic groups under the patronage of some Arab countries have also been recruiting jihadis to fight alongside the Syrian rebels.

This is a highly dangerous situation undermining national security. These are all symptoms of a state losing control.

It is indeed a positive move by the new government to review the national security strategy and a wise decision to take on board the military leadership to formulate a strategy to confront the new security challenges.

For a policy to be effective, it is imperative for the civilian and military leadership to be on the same page. Unfortunately, such coordination has been missing in the past.

For an effective and coherent policy, however, there’s a need for a clear perception of the challenges and a strategic vision to deal with them.

Unfortunately, both seem to be missing thus far. The government’s narrative on the rising tide of militant violence and religious extremism appears to be confused and flawed. That certainly does not inspire much confidence in the government’s ability to devise a viable security strategy.

There’s been a massive resurgence in violence since the Sharif government took charge some three weeks ago.

The Quetta bus carnage, attack on a hospital, suicide bombings at a funeral in Mardan, killing of Shia worshippers in Peshawar and now the brutal murder of 10 foreign mountaineers in Gilgit-Baltistan indicate the growing reach of the militants and the ineptitude of the state. An extremely weak response to those gruesome attacks and the killings of innocent people raises serious questions about the government’s resolve to combat terrorism and militancy more effectively.

After the Quetta incident, Interior Minister Nisar Ali Khan’s conflicting stance on negotiations with the militants indicates either his lack of understanding about the militant threat to national security or reflects a policy of appeasement.

There seems to be no clarity among officials on the dangerous nexus of various outlawed militant groups, sectarian outfits and their foreign patrons.

Given these ambiguities, there is a danger that the new national security policy, like in the past, may just be reduced to a law and order issue with no connection to economic, defence and foreign policies. One can only hope that the perspective gets clearer during deliberations among the different stakeholders.

The government has set a deadline of June 30 for the formulation of the broad contours of a national security policy. One wonders whether such a short deadline would suffice to get this critical policy ready.

Zahid Hussain, "Security meltdown," Dawn. 2013-06-25.
Keywords: Social sciences , Economics , Government-Pakistan , Economic issues , Economic crisis , Economic policy , Economic growth , Armed forces , Social issues , Social rights , Security policy , Religious issues , Violence , Terrorism , Extremism , Shias , Jihad , Nisar Ali , Karachi , Pakistan , Balochistan , Quetta